Combine arbitrary tracks from multiple files (ex.Lossless merge/concatenation of arbitrary files (with identical codecs parameters, e.g.Losslessly rearrange the order of video/audio segments.Losslessly cut out parts of video/audio (for cutting away commercials etc.).Lossless cutting of most video and audio formats.Everything is extremely fast because it does an almost direct data copy, fueled by the awesome FFmpeg which does all the grunt work. Or you can add a music or subtitle track to your video without needing to encode. It lets you quickly extract the good parts from your videos and discard many gigabytes of data without doing a slow re-encode and thereby losing quality. The main feature is lossless trimming and cutting of video and audio files, which is great for saving space by rough-cutting your large video files taken from a video camera, GoPro, drone, etc. LosslessCut aims to be the ultimate cross platform FFmpeg GUI for extremely fast and lossless operations on video, audio, subtitle and other related media files. Thanks to my supporters and everyone who purchased LosslessCut! When all the pieces are deleted, click File, Save.The swiss army knife of lossless video/audio editing If there are more pieces to cut, I mark each piece, one at a time, with A and B markers and press Del to delete that piece. If I want to cut out a piece, I mark the beginning and end of the piece as A and B then press Del. I mark the end of the piece the same way (Up and Dn then ctrl+PgDn)įile, Save saves only the piece starting at A and ending at B. I press the Up and Dn keys to be sure It's at an intra frame then mark A by pressing ctrl+PgUp. ![]() If I want to save a piece in the middle, I move to the begining (clicking the slider or dragging the slider and/or holding the up-arrow and down-arrow keys) (press End, then Dn, then Up, then ctrl+PgDn) Then I set the end to the last intra frame (press Home, Up, then Dn, then ctrl+PgUP) I often want the video to begin and end on an intra frame, so I usually set the A marker to the first intra frame: I usually have the out video codex and audio codex set to Copy. Then I drag a file or files to the avidemux window. I find that cutting with avidemux is very easy. And the latest versions seem to have -if not as simple as Cut-Assistant- a very useful method for working with cut-clips. And there being a 32-bit version, a couple 32-bit Puppys.īut LosslessCut seems to run well. As is currently usual, I'm running Bionicpup64 and the both versions 6.0 and 5.0.5 segfault. Because it then occurred to me that maybe either VidCutter or LosslessCut might already have that function. As you're not changing codecs or resizing, it occurred to me that if you named each cut alpha-numerically as you went along, it is likely that a simple bash-script could be used to concat the individual clips. The thing is that as you are working you give names to the cuts and will generally have a good idea of where each cut will be in the finished product: most often just chronologically following the previous cut you made. With avidemux, after you've made your cuts you have to manually select each to add it to what is to be the finished product. The one thing I missed with avidemux that Cut-Assistant provided was the how easy Cut-Assistant made merging cuts by generating a 'play-list' as you made the cuts. ".it all boils down to one thing, really.Getting so you know your software inside out". Well, the discussion got me thinking again. Not everyone wants to do things the same way, after all. And is why I always try to make available to the community as many software packages that work with Puppy as I can. That's why there will always be choices, and, as I'm sure you know, my personal motto where Puppy's concerned has always been "choice in all things". That of familiarity, and getting so you know your software inside out.to the point where you're comfortable with it, you enjoy using it, and you're 100% happy with the results you get. I think in all honesty, Mike, that whatever video-editing software you DO "settle down with" and become proficient at, it all boils down to one thing, really. Or if -as I did about cut-assistant- they offer some feature not available under Linux applications even if it turns out that they aren't functional when you hope that someone can figure out how to make them so. Mike, himself, has posted about some.īut do make sure that they do run under Wine report what limitations they have and, especially, if you're expected to pay for them. We do appreciate reports about programs which run under Wine. ![]() ![]() Unoo, Mike may have gotten up on the wrong side of the bed this morning.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |